Oppose the Criminalisation of Peaceful Protest at Animal Testing Facilities
To: The House Of Lords
Subject: Oppose the Criminalisation of Peaceful Protest at Animal Testing Facilities
I am writing to urge you to oppose the recent amendment that seeks to criminalise peaceful protest at animal testing facilities by designating them as key national infrastructure.
This proposed change represents a serious and dangerous erosion of fundamental democratic rights. Peaceful assembly and freedom of expression are cornerstones of a free society. To imprison or fine individuals for standing, lawfully and non‑violently, in defence of animals subjected to experimentation is a profound injustice.
Animal testing is an area of legitimate and long‑standing ethical concern. Public scrutiny, transparency, and the right to protest are essential safeguards against abuse. Reclassifying laboratories in this way does not protect science; it shields it from accountability and silences moral opposition.
I respectfully ask you, as a member of the House of Lords, to:
- Reject any legislation that criminalises peaceful protest.
- Defend the rights of citizens to speak out against animal suffering.
- Uphold the United Kingdom’s commitment to civil liberties and humane values
History will judge how we treated the voiceless, and how we treated those who spoke for them
A Dark Day for Animal Justice and Free Speech: UK Votes to Criminalise Peaceful Protest at Animal Testing Sites
Today marks a profoundly troubling moment for animal rights, civil liberties, and the very heart of democratic expression in the United Kingdom. In a vote that has stunned activists and defenders of freedom alike, UK MPs led by Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood have passed a controversial amendment that makes peaceful protests at animal testing facilities a criminal offence punishable by up to one year in prison and unlimited fines.
This development is not just a shift in public order law; it is an attack on the fundamental rights of people to stand up for voiceless animals and to challenge the status quo of cruelty a status quo that demands far greater public accountability and humane reform.
What Has Changed And Why It Matters
Under the new amendment to the Public Order Act, facilities involved in animal testing including breeding centres and laboratories are now legally designated as key national infrastructure. This dubious reclassification empowers the state to clamp down on peaceful civic action, placing animal welfare protests on par with activities near airports, power stations, and motorways.
This move has dangerous implications:
- It essentially criminalises compassionate civil disobedience.
- It chills public dissent against controversial practices hidden behind lab doors.
- It sets a precedent that could extend to other forms of ethical protest in the future.
This measure sailed through the House of Commons on a 301-to-110 vote, despite widespread opposition from civil liberties organisations and animal rights groups. A small group of Labour MPs bravely resisted, but the government’s majority prevailed
Why This Harms Animals Not Helps Them
Supporters of this law argue it protects vital scientific work or prevents disruption of life science operations. But make no mistake this tactic protects secrecy over scrutiny. Animal testing remains one of the most ethically fraught practices in modern science. It subjects sentient beings dogs, cats, monkeys, rabbits to procedures that often inflict pain, fear, and death. The British public has repeatedly shown growing discomfort with these practices, but today’s vote says loud and clear: ethical objections will no longer be tolerated in public spaces.
This is deeply at odds with a society that prides itself on humane values and democratic freedom.
Voices of Resistance Inside and Outside Parliament
Critics of the bill have struck a unified tone of alarm:
- Civil liberties advocates warn this is a draconian crackdown on peaceful assembly and free speech.
- Animal rights organisers including those maintaining long-term vigils such as the Camp Beagle campaign have pledged to continue protesting, even in the face of arrest.
- Opposing MPs have pointed out the law’s chilling irony: the party that once opposed such restrictions now champions them
Dog Desk Animal Action’s Response
At Dog Desk Animal Action, we are outraged but undeterred.
This legislation does not silence us. It amplifies our resolve.
We stand firm in our belief that:
- Peaceful protest is not a crime. To criminalise moral opposition is to criminalise empathy itself.
- Animals deserve transparency and humane treatment, not state protection for cruelty.
- A free society must protect the rights of its people to speak, assemble, and advocate especially for those who have no voice.
Our mission has always been to fight cruelty, protect the vulnerable, and push for a kinder world for dogs everywhere. Today’s vote is a setback but it is also a rallying cry.
What Happens Next
Though the Commons has passed this amendment, it must still face scrutiny in the House of Lords. That chamber has a long-standing tradition of challenging overreach. Public pressure now matters more than ever. We urge:
- Petitions opposing the law
- Continued peaceful demonstration
We will not be silenced we will be seen and heard.
Stand With Us
If you believe in freedom of speech, ethical scientific practice, and an end to animal suffering, then join Dog Desk Animal Action today. Make your voice count. Speak up for dogs, speak up for animals, and speak up for democracy.
Peaceful protest should never be treated as a crime. And compassion should never be legislated out of existence.
